Subject	It all comes down to maintenance
Posted by	RobZ32 on June 27, 2012 at 10:46 AM
	This message has been viewed 133 times.
In Reply To	TT vs. NA Reliability posted by ZRoTTyZ on June 26, 2012 at 01:34 PM
Message	and the initial condition of the Z that you buy (TT or NA). I've had my NA a little over 3yrs now and have had no critical issues; however I did do all the preventive maintenance as soon as I got it (timing belt, changed all fluids, tune up, etc). Now as Red Hawk said I have heard of more NA's making it to 200k+ miles on the same engine than TT's. In the end if you are worried about the upkeep price, the TT will require a bit more as there are extra parts that an NA does not have. Also keep in mind that if you get bored of the NA you can always make it/swap a TT :) Rob It's never "DONE", just finished enough to drive :-) - BigTDogg (MA)
Follow Ups	TT vs. NA Reliability - ZRoTTyZ 13:34:22 06/26/12 100% depends on the individual car at this point. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 13:41:13 06/26/12 Re: 100% depends on the individual owner care. (n/m) - njz 14:05:32 06/26/12 All else equal, an NA will be cheaper to maintain, no doubt. - zellamay 15:43:30 06/26/12 I got to that point, decided to replace all the broken NA - Red Hawk (CO) 15:48:20 06/26/12 My NA was stolen around 8 years ago... - CameronSF 15:55:39 06/26/12 I've always wondered what happens to stolen Z's... - samsung-Z [Houston] 20:15:52 06/26/12 It all comes down to maintenance - RobZ32 10:46:07 06/27/12 Funny with stolen Z's - KA8 13:14:33 06/28/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.